File transfer speed fat32 vs ntfs

See full list on flexense. But, is it an optimal file system to be used with modern USB3 flash disks? Which of the available file systems is more optimized for small files and which one is more optimized for large files? Which of the available file systems is more optimized for read operations and which one is more optimized for write operations? In order to answer these questions, we have tested three different USB3 flash disks using a diversified set of benchmarks.

All tests were performed using DiskBoss v4. Each USB3 disk for each file system has been tested using an identical set of benchmarks including:. Benchmark results from all USB3 flash disks using three different file systems were normalized and compared relative to the performance of the FAT32 file system, which is by default used on all USB3 flash disks.

In addition to the explained performance tests, we have monitored the test computer using the SysGauge system monitoring utility, which is capable of monitoring the disk transfer rate, file system performance and operating system resource usage and generate various types of graphical performance monitoring reports showing what exactly happened inside of the computer during the performed performance tests.

For each tested file system, we have copied exactly the same set of files and during each file copy operation monitored the following operating system performance counters:. For example, as it is shown on the following SysGauge performance monitoring report, in order to complete the file copy operation, the NTFS file system performed 86, file system control operations, the exFAT file system performed 87, file system control operations and the FAT32 file system performed , file system control operations.

According to the system calls monitoring chart, during the file copy operation, the operating system performed , system calls when copying data to the NTFS file system, , system calls in order to copy the same set of files to the exFAT file system and 1,, system calls when copying the same set of files to the FAT32 file system.

Once again, the NTFS file system manages to complete the file copy operation using less system resources, the exFAT file system comes in the second place and the FAT32 trailing the list with the most system overhead. Finally, according to the CPU context switches chart, when copying the set of files to the NTFS file system, the operating system performed , context switches.

On the other hand, the exFAT file system required 1,, CPU context switches to copy the same set of files and the FAT32 file system required 1,, context switched to perform the same file copy operation. The NTFS file system consistently shows better efficiency and lower CPU and system resource usage when compared to the exFAT file system and the FAT32 file system, which means file copy operations are completed faster and more CPU and system resources are remaining for user applications and other operating system tasks.

In order to reformat a USB flash disk in Windows 7, open the Windows Explorer application, select the 'Computer' item in the left-side view, select the required USB flash disk in the right side view, click the right mouse button and select the 'Format' menu item.

Combined Device Index: is a composite figure representing an overall performance rating based on the average of the Combined Index figures over the four file sizes. Higher is better, i. I used a MB. AVI Video file for all testing. Of course here the lowest time or score is the better one. Here of course higher scores or rates is better. Same file used here again, same setup with FAT32 used as baseline for first graph:. So what have we learned from all of this, besides the fact that I need to get a life and out from in front of this computer?

Sandra and Diskbench are totally different tests with different results, if we go back and look at the Diskbench tests we can see:.

Building a cloud practice with Microsoft Azure presents many possibilities for innovation, flexibility, and enhancements for workloads and processes. Thank you, you are now subscribed to Downtime: the Datto Blog! NTFS supports: Very large files Different file permissions and encryption Automatically restores consistency by using log file and checkpoint information File compression when running out of disk space Establishing disk quotas, limiting space users can use NTFS vs FAT32 FAT is the more simple file system of the two, but NTFS offers different enhancements and offers increased security.

Compression: FAT32 does not offer any compression option. Get Our Weekly Updates Subscribe. Learn More. It uses the File Allocation Table to describe the allocation stats of the clusters in a file system and the link relationship between each.

It works as a content table for the OS and indicates where the directories and files are stored on the disk. Starting with Windows NT 3. It is introduced as a replacement for the FAT file system; it is more robust and effective because it makes use of advanced data structure to improve reliability, disk space utilization and overall performance.