How to hack into the cia

In the wake of the terrorist attack in San Bernardino in December , the Department of Justice a misnomer if ever there was one took Apple to court in an attempt to force the company to provide a backdoor into the iOS platform — circumventing the encryption protecting those devices. The test case ended with no win for the surveillance state and no precedent set.

In the immediate aftermath of that failure, the surveillance hawks in Congress introduced legislation to require companies offering encrypted devices and applications to create backdoors that would allow government agencies to sidestep the encryption.

That legislation also failed. In fact, it never got out of committee. As the press release explains:. Since the CIA has gained political and budgetary preeminence over the U.

The CIA found itself building not just its now infamous drone fleet, but a very different type of covert, globe-spanning force — its own substantial fleet of hackers. The source wishes to initiate a public debate about the security, creation, use, proliferation and democratic control of cyberweapons. The leaked information also shows that — after developing the cyberweapons — the CIA hackers handled them in ways that violate the most basic chain of custody.

The inescapable conclusion of the CIA losing control of its cyberweapons is that they are now likely in the hands of others — both hostile nation-states and individuals — with even less restraint than the CIA, if that were possible. If those weapons — instead of being bits and bytes, lines of computer code — were guns and bombs, the result would be the same. As WikiLeaks put it:. Since they are entirely comprised of information they can be copied quickly with no marginal cost.

The documents and files were leaked to WikiLeaks by an unknown source who had access to them because of the haphazard way in which they were circulated within the CIA and its contractor companies. Due to the dangerous nature of the cyberweapons and instructions for their use included in the leak, and not wanting to be guilty of the further spread of the cyberweapons, WikiLeaks made a surprising decision: For perhaps the first time in its decade-long history, WikiLeaks redacted the information before publishing it.

Those operating systems account for nearly all computers and mobile devices worldwide. The leaked documents show that the CIA has developed techniques to remotely activate a wide range of devices including powering them on, if they are turned off and control the cameras and microphones — turning them into surveillance devices that allow the hacker to both listen to and watch the victim of the surveillance.

The implications of remote control access are staggering and go far beyond the ability to watch and listen as bad as that is. Having control over the device would also mean the hacker could access all files and folders on the device. This would not only mean that the hackers could view those files and folders, it would mean they could add and delete at will. As this writer said in an online article dated March 8, Such a sting operation would look — for all the world — like a legitimate law-enforcement activity.

Even if it did not end in a prosecution and prison, the victim could be branded for life. If that seems far-fetched, there is a well-documented case where this is almost exactly what happened. Her computer — an iMac — began making a loud noise as the fan ran at full speed, indicating that the processor was overheating.

That is odd behavior for an Apple product, even more so because the same thing had happened a few days earlier to the Toshiba laptop issued to her by CBS News. Attkisson took her computer to an expert. Attkisson could have been charged under the Espionage Act for possessing those documents.

To frame me? She points out in her book that both CBS News and Don Allison, a security specialist at Kore Logic, confirmed the presence of the government spyware on her computer. While a great deal of data has been expertly wiped in an attempt to cover-up the deed, Don [Allison] is able to find remnants of what was once there. For that matter, how do hackers both government and non-government ever gain control over any device? All software has the potential for vulnerabilities.

But the hacking army did not limit its arsenal of cyberweapons to only those geared toward Windows. Hacking tools were also developed to exploit vulnerabilities found in other operating systems.

A sampling of some of the programs developed by the CIA shows just how invasive these weapons can be:. Even the names of these weapons are very telling. Instead, these tools are often named after evil things — albeit based on science-fiction characters.

The character is an evil alien hybrid who wants to take over the world. He attempts to do so by infecting those with whom he comes into contact with a virus that brings them both under his control and into a single consciousness with him.

The Weeping Angels in Doctor Who are creatures who appear to be stone statues as long as they are being watched. Once their victim looks away, the Weeping Angels begin moving and doing their evil deeds.

The hacking tools in these programs — as seen in the sample list above — allow the hackers to take complete control over the target devices. It is as if the hackers are sitting at the keyboard, looking at the monitor. Worse, because the control happens surreptitiously, the owner or user of the device has no idea he or she is being watched, listened to, and otherwise spied upon.

For mobile devices, the news is perhaps even worse. Many have long known that mobile devices are the most difficult of electronics to lock down to a level of good security. This is because the very nature of smartphones depends on them always having a connection to mobile towers for both voice and data connectivity.

Coupled with the GPS capabilities of the devices and the presence of built-in cameras front-facing and rear-facing and other sensors to detect a long list of environmental variables, this makes for an electronic device that seems designed to report on your location and activity. Any vulnerability in the system that can be exploited instantly turns such a device into a surveillance tool that is turned on its owner.

The EDG is responsible for the development, testing and operational support of all backdoors, exploits, malicious payloads, trojans, viruses and any other kind of malware used by the CIA in its covert operations world-wide. Keep in mind that — in the more than 10 years it has been exposing the corruption and illegality of governments and organizations around the world — WikiLeaks has never been shown to have published any documents that have later been proved to be false.

The CIA admits that they have been breached a few times. As in literally breached the CIA. Even the director back then was stunned that someone breached their system.

Now, the actual question is not if you can hack the CIA. That is doable. The question is how long? Now, you want to know how it ended for the hacker right? Well, not so good if I'm honest. You see, yes, the hacker breached the CIA. But, he only breached it for 1. He was then booted from the server. All those years of studying and you could only hack the CIA for 1.

But that's not the worst part. The CIA's mainframe detected a breach at 1. That means that the hacker was immediately booted at the span of 0. The worst part is that 15 minutes later after the hacker was kicked out of the mainframe, a bunch of Homeland Security officers and some CIA Agents were at the hacker's house and arrested the said hacker.

That's not the worst part. The sentence was 15 years in a maximum security prison for hacking 1. By the way I think I'm going to off topic. I'm supposed to give you the instructions on hacking the CIA..

It's possible though. But you must beat the record. That'll put you in the Hacker's World of Records which currently doesn't exist. Anyways, seriously now, Here is the instructions. You need to have a speed which can surpass the CIA's 10 -Gigabit per seconds internet. Eh, the fastest ones are in Britain. Which is only 50 mbps. Which is fast to you and me. Remember that the internet is a system of interconnected computer networks that link together called IP Address to go to a specific site.

That's why the page loads. Back in the day, if you go to facebook, it is faster since the FB headquarters are locationed in only 1 computer. Now, since facebook is stationed in different computers [servers], you have to pass through all those servers to go to Zuckerberg's website, facebook.

The simplest way would be going to mmultiple websites. The more websites you load and use, the more IP addresses that enshroud you, therefore taking the mainframe a longer time to process where you exactly are since the mainframe has to go to all those addresses just to trace you. In the hacker's case, he has 1, IP Addresses covering him.